Oscar E. Toscano
Attorney at Law
625 West Broadway, Suite B
Glendale, CA 91204

(800) 303-7500
(818) 241-0806
(818) 482-0785
Fax (818) 241-2842

 

 

REASONABLE RATES

There is only one person who can help you and your family through such things as death, divorce, custody disputes, criminal charges, auto accidents, injuries, lawsuits against you? Who am I talking about? I'm talking about a lawyer.

Clients seek the services of a lawyer in the worst days of their lives. To many the word "lawyer" is a dirty word. Others simply don't want to talk to them. But the bottom line is...

Everybody needs one!

That's right, not having a lawyer, particularly during troubled times, can spell DISASTER! But even when everything is going fine, you still need a lawyer! Do you have a will? Do you know exactly what's in it? When is the last time it was updated? Have you had an accident or injury? Do you know if you could be liable for the damages caused or if you will be able to collect for your injuries and damages? How do you protect yourself when selling or buying a home?

Ok. You may agree with me that lawyers are essential, but how do you know which lawyer to trust? How do you know how to protect yourself from paying outrageous fees? You must be educated as to how lawyers bill to understand how to protect yourself.

Let me please introduce myself. My name is Oscar E. Toscano and I am a lawyer. Over the last 23 years I have been earning "trust" helping many people like you with their legal matters. I am an AV rated lawyer. (This is the highest rating for lawyers according to Martindale Hubbell).

Please understand that I am different from most lawyers. I like to develop a warm, professional lasting relationship with my clients. I aim to do a great job and at the same time save you money. If I succeed, you will be pleased and refer other potential clients to me. Once I explain to you the alternatives, if you decide we can work together, that's great. But if not, at least you walk away with an understanding of how lawyers bill for their time that you never had before. And that's what's important to me!

In California, lawyers are subject to the rules of professional conduct. Rule 3-300 applies to attorneys fees and states as follows:

"A member shall not enter into a business transaction with a client; or knowingly acquire an ownership, possessory, security, or other pecuniary interest adverse to a client, unless each of the following requirements has been satisfied:
(A) The transaction or acquisition and its terms are fair and reasonable to the client and are fully disclosed and transmitted in writing to the client in a manner which should reasonably have been understood by the client; and
(B) The client is advised in writing that the client may seek the advice of an independent lawyer of the client's choice and is given a reasonable opportunity to seek that advice; and
(C) The client thereafter consents in writing to the terms of the transaction or the terms of the acquisition." (Emphasis added).
As pointed out in Hawk v. State Bar,(1988),45 Cal.3d 589, 600: "acquiring the ability to summarily extinguish the client's interest in property is what makes the acquisition `adverse'". Further, "[a]ll dealings between attorney and his client that are beneficial to the attorneys will be closely scrutinized with the utmost strictness for any unfairness. [Ritter v. State Bar, (1985), 40 Cal. 3d 595, 602]. Failure to give the clients time to seek independent counsel is not a mere technical violation." [Ritter, supra, at page 602].
In essence, when an attorney creates the right to collect disputed fees without prior judicial scrutiny, it is contrary to law. [Broackway v. State Bar, 1991, 53 Cal. 3d 51, 64; See Silver v. State Bar, (1974), 13 Cal. 3d 134, 139; See Hawk v. State Bar,(1988), 45 Cal. 3d 589,600. The transactions between a lawyer and a client are closely scrutinized with the utmost strictness for any unfairness. [Ritter v. State Bar, supra at 602 no compliance with Rule 3-300 in obtaining the deeds of trust or jewelry as shown herein.
In Beery v. State Bar, 1987, 43 Cal.3d 802, the California Supreme Court pointed out that an attorney:

"...must make it manifest that he gave to his client 'all that reasonable advice against himself that he would have given him against a third person." [Felton v. Le Breton (1891) 92 Cal. 457, 469 [28 P. 490]. See also Estate of Witt (1926) 198 Cal. 407, 419 [245 P. 197]; Gold v. Greenwald (1966) 247 Cal.App.2d 296, 305?306 [55 Cal.Rptr. 660].)
In Beery v. State Bar, 1987, 43 Cal.3d 802 attorney Beery was suspended from the practice of law for five years. The recommendation was based on a single incident of misconduct that involved concealment of relevant information. The Beery Court held that:

"...inasmuch as the relation of attorney and client is one wherein the attorney is apt to have very great influence over the client, especially in transactions which are a part of or intimately connected with the very business in reference to which the relation exists, such transactions are always scrutinized by Courts with jealous care, and are set aside at the mere instance of the client, unless the attorney can show by extrinsic evidence that his client acted with full knowledge of all the facts connected with such transaction, and fully understood their effect; and in any attempt by the attorney to enforce an agreement on the part of the client growing out of such transaction, the burden of proof is always upon the attorney to show that the dealing was fair and just, and that the client was fully advised. [Id, at Page 813].
The attorney? client relationship has been held to be "...a fiduciary relation of the very highest character..." [Neel v. Magana, Olney, Levy, Cathcart & Gelfand (1971) 6 Cal.3d 176, 189?190 [98 Cal.Rptr. 837, 491 P.2d 421]; Clancy v. State Bar (1969) 71 Cal.2d 140, 146?148 [77 Cal.Rptr. 657, 454 P.2d 329], and "[o]ur principal concern is always the protection of the public, the preservation of confidence in the legal profession, and the maintenance of the highest possible professional standard for attorneys." Beery, p. 816.
What the above really means is that lawyers must charge a reasonable fee for the services rendered. I'll look forward to meeting you.

Warmly,

OSCAR E. TOSCANO
Attorney At Law